If Keystone XL Pipeline Is Approved, I’m Blaming LA Kings’ Coach Darryl Sutter.

Darryl Sutter - President ObamaI don’t follow NHL hockey much but if I did, my team would be the Vancouver Canucks. Now, assuming the Canucks were my team, and President Obama approved the Keystone XL pipeline project, the first shirt I would buy would say:

“My favorite team is the Vancouver Canucks. My second favorite team is whoever is playing the LA Kings.”

Why? Because yesterday, President Obama met with the two Los Angeles teams that won their respective league titles – MLS’s LA Galaxy and the NHL’s LA Kings – and one member of the party, LA King’s coach Darryl Sutter, wanted to lean on the Prez a little and talk about the Keystone XL pipeline. Alberta-born Darryl Sutter owns a 3000 acre ranch near Viking and he wants to see the pipeline get built. From The Globe and Mail:

“I’m gonna ask him about it – damn rights I am. It’s 20 feet underground. How can we not want to keep North America [energy self-sufficient]? Why does the border have to separate that? It doesn’t make sense. For sure, I’m going to ask him.”

I hope Coach Sutter wasn’t as successful with the President as his team was in the Stanley Cup finals – we don’t need Canada’s dirty tar sand oil.

So if by some miracle, President Obama decides against the KXL pipeline, I think there’s an opportunity for TransCanada to domestically refine their own tar sand oil in Alberta and they can do it on 3000 acres of land near the town of Viking. Sorry coach. [The Globe and Mail]

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestmail

TransCanada/Keystone XL: Turning Climate Deniers Into Believers One Section Of Pipeline At A Time.

Michael Bishop vs TransCanadaMichael Bishop is currently doing battle with TransCanada for coercing him into letting the Keystone XL pipeline through his land. The section of pipeline is now in but Mr. Bishop is going to fight TransCanada in court to have it removed.

Watch the video below from The David Pakman Show to hear the full-story about Mr. Bishop’s fight with TransCanada and how his opinion of climate change has taken an about-face. [CDCW]


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestmail

Everything You Need To Know About Tar Sand Oil And Keystone XL In One Video.

The Keystone XL Tar Sands Climate Threat video perfectly explains the environmental costs of the tar sand oil and the importance of President Obama’s decision to build, or not build, the Keystone XL pipeline.

US politicians supporting the Keystone XL pipeline point to energy independence as one of the main reasons why it needs to be built. Unfortunately, they never considered how important energy independence is going to be in our warming future. Sounds like the “Cut off your nose to spite your face” doctrine is in full effect . [CDCW]

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestmail

Is The Keystone XL Pipeline Decision A “Shit Or Get Off The Pot” Climate Crossroads For President Obama?

Keystone XL Pipeline decision and President ObamaWith tar sand oil, I truly believe that nature was trying to tell us to leave the stuff in the ground by making the franken-oil so costly to extract. Tar sand’s oil is the shit sandwich of liquid fuels and we’ll be sucking on it for 50 years if the 2000 mile Keystone XL pipeline is approved. President Obama volleyed the decision forward into his second term but he’ll soon have to make a tough choice that environmentalists believe will show what side of the climate change issue he’s on.

But wait – are members of his own party who oppose Keystone XL already giving him preemptive out?

Here’s a quote from Henry Waxman on President Obama’s upcoming decision (Guardian):

“This [Keystone XL] is only a small issue compared to the overall objective that the president and we want to achieve. What would you like me to do? Should I say to the president, ‘If you don’t agree with me on Keystone, I’m not going to work with you on solving the climate change issue’? That would be a little bit childish and counterproductive.”

Henry Waxman… really? Sure sounds like Rep. Henry “Future of our economy lies in clean energy, not increasing our reliance on the dirtiest source of gasoline imaginable” Waxman, who is political bros. with President Obama, is giving him a free pass on this issue and that worries me.

If I were to place a bet today, I would put my money on President Obama approving the Keystone XL pipeline. I think Rep. Waxman’s current take on the decision is very telling – it’s like he’s readying himself for the bad news from the President he normally supports. We’ll see how it plays out. [Guardian]

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestmail