Sunlounge Tanning & Spa In Los Angeles Gets 15-30% Of Their Power From Solar. Is That Bad?

Sunlounge Solar Powered Spa and Tanning SalonSunlounge Tanning & Spa’s own website refers to their role as the “sun’s middleman” and that’s because they get 15-30% of their electricity from solar power. It seems more than a little crazy that people would seek out the artificial sunlight from a tanning bed that is powered by solar panels versus getting it directly from the sun; it’s like choosing to pay for a knockoff when the actual product is free. But according to Sunlounge, there are many good reasons why you should artificial over organic sunning.

Grist.org posted a tongue in cheek story about Sunlounge and how it was possibly inspired by a Photoshop contest for stupid technology. But Jubbling thinks that other than trying to over-leverage the “going green” message, Sunlounge is doing something positive by using solar power. Doesn’t take the all the crazy out the idea but I have to admit, because of the solar and not the going green message, Sunlounge would be first tanning salon in Los Angeles that I’d think of when I wouldn’t go tanning.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Why The Heck Do We Need To Bring Up Space-Based Solar Panels Again?

Space Based Solar PanelsJust when you think solar might be getting traction here on earth, another article about the viability of space-based solar power comes out. Reuters posted it today, Orbital solar power plants touted for energy needs, and put forth the advantages of launching solar panels into space. The basics behind space-based solar power are simple – solar panels in space can collect energy from the sun 24/7. Then the electricity generated can be beamed back to earth via microwave or laser.

Jubbling’s take: With budget cuts, NASA and their counterparts need to stay relevant so pursuing ideas like space-based solar power generation may help justify their continued existence. But the cost of launching solar panels in space to get 12 more hours of daily sunlight is just crazy. The most important sentence in the Reuters article was:

The study did not estimate a potential overall price tag for completing the project.

We did some searching and found data from a 2009 article in E360, Solar Power from Space: Moving Beyond Science Fiction, that the Pentagon estimated it would cost $10 billion to put a 10-megawatt solar power plant in space by 2016. Compare that to the $1 billion spent to generate 250-megawatts of solar power in Nevada and Arizona.

Artemis Innovation Management Solutions of California recently received nearly $100,000 from NASA to study the feasibility of space-based solar. Jubbling would take only $2500 to tell them that we think the idea of space-based solar panels is totally batshit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Really? Microwave The Bejesus Out Of Orange Peels To Make Biodegradable Plastic?

Using A Microwave To Turn Orange Peels Into Biodegradable PlasticIs this news or is somebody out there goofing on us by doling out nonsense stories to distract us? It’s hard to tell when you read an article like Orange peels could be made into biodegradable plastic. I’m starting to think the folks over at the Weekly World News, the world’s only reliable news (their words, not mine), is behind all of these stories for the greenies to consume and get excited about.

Maybe a better story would be that on your next shopping trip, choose ONE additional non-plastic option so these guys don’t have to nuke oranges for 2-hours to produce one that is bio-degradable.

Jubbling: Making consuming less, less consuming

Related article: Orange Gold: Citrus Peels Move from the Landfill to the Engine

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Champagne Environmentalist: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Question: Is the net effect of celebrity support in eco causes a positive or do they put off as many people as they attract?

There is a great article on The Guardian’s Green Living Blog, Hypocrisy of champagne environmentalists is deceitful and distracting. Its author, Ed Gillespie, writes about how celebrities and public figures begSting Amazon us to live a more sustainable lifestyle and yet enjoy a lifestyle most of us can only dream of. He offers several examples of eco-celebrities and their extreme consumption.

Jubbling posted an article in May 2010 about the hypocritical nature of Hollywood’s preaching and its reality – Hollywood Love$ Green Message$. How Does It Feel About Jubbling?. Being an eco-celebrity seems to be the 2000′s equivalent to the 1990′s recovering addicts; it gets you in the news. I have a feeling that Eco-Celebrity Rehab is just around the corner.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

$70-Large 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid Qualifies For Tax Break (And I Kick Myself In The Middle Again)

According to Green Car Reports, the 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid qualifies for a $1800 tax credit and I have to wonder – how does this happen? The US government offers the rebate to motivate consumers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles but in this case, something has to be wrong when a $70,000, 380hp, 20/24 mpg car qualifies for the credit. Automakers are obviously aware of how to get their cars hybrid-tax-credit-worthy and I’d hate to think that we are all paying for it. It seems unfair, especially when the my 1999 van also gets 20 mpg’s but goes 0-60 mph in 16.1 seconds and the Porsche Cayenne gets to 60 mph 10 seconds faster.

So congrats to the person buying the Porsche Cayenne S – you are going hybrid which is better – but for karma sake, maybe you could skip the line on your tax form where you get the $1800 credit. Or take the credit and donate it to a worthwhile cause… like Jubbling or me directly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Jubwinked? New Energy Technologies Inc.’s SolarWindow Uses Spray-On Solar Cells

New Energy Technologies SolarWindowOnce again, I hope New Energy Technologies is legit but I can’t help feeling Jubwinked again by a company with a technology that promises too much. New Energy Technologies just issued a press release about their spray-on-window solar cells that can outperform rooftop solar panels by 300%. When applied, the see-through SolarWindow technology will absorb sunlight entering the building as well as internal office lighting. According to New Energy Technologies, the SolarWindow “is made possible by spraying an electricity-generating coating on to glass at room temperature.” Conventional solar panel manufacturing requires high-heat in order to apply the the solar cells onto a opaque substrate and can not be transparent.

New Energy Technologies other product is MotionPower. MotionPower is basically a “speed bump” that generates electricity from the excess energy produced by moving cars and trucks passing over them. Here is a video that describes how the idea works:

YouTube Preview Image

In related news, Pat Mehiney is taking his wool socks public after demonstrating to 3 or 4 people his amazing ability to generate electricity*.

*The static variety

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon