Why The Heck Do We Need To Bring Up Space-Based Solar Panels Again?

Space Based Solar PanelsJust when you think solar might be getting traction here on earth, another article about the viability of space-based solar power comes out. Reuters posted it today, Orbital solar power plants touted for energy needs, and put forth the advantages of launching solar panels into space. The basics behind space-based solar power are simple – solar panels in space can collect energy from the sun 24/7. Then the electricity generated can be beamed back to earth via microwave or laser.

Jubbling’s take: With budget cuts, NASA and their counterparts need to stay relevant so pursuing ideas like space-based solar power generation may help justify their continued existence. But the cost of launching solar panels in space to get 12 more hours of daily sunlight is just crazy. The most important sentence in the Reuters article was:

The study did not estimate a potential overall price tag for completing the project.

We did some searching and found data from a 2009 article in E360, Solar Power from Space: Moving Beyond Science Fiction, that the Pentagon estimated it would cost $10 billion to put a 10-megawatt solar power plant in space by 2016. Compare that to the $1 billion spent to generate 250-megawatts of solar power in Nevada and Arizona.

Artemis Innovation Management Solutions of California recently received nearly $100,000 from NASA to study the feasibility of space-based solar. Jubbling would take only $2500 to tell them that we think the idea of space-based solar panels is totally batshit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Really? Microwave The Bejesus Out Of Orange Peels To Make Biodegradable Plastic?

Using A Microwave To Turn Orange Peels Into Biodegradable PlasticIs this news or is somebody out there goofing on us by doling out nonsense stories to distract us? It’s hard to tell when you read an article like Orange peels could be made into biodegradable plastic. I’m starting to think the folks over at the Weekly World News, the world’s only reliable news (their words, not mine), is behind all of these stories for the greenies to consume and get excited about.

Maybe a better story would be that on your next shopping trip, choose ONE additional non-plastic option so these guys don’t have to nuke oranges for 2-hours to produce one that is bio-degradable.

Jubbling: Making consuming less, less consuming

Related article: Orange Gold: Citrus Peels Move from the Landfill to the Engine

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Champagne Environmentalist: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Question: Is the net effect of celebrity support in eco causes a positive or do they put off as many people as they attract?

There is a great article on The Guardian’s Green Living Blog, Hypocrisy of champagne environmentalists is deceitful and distracting. Its author, Ed Gillespie, writes about how celebrities and public figures begSting Amazon us to live a more sustainable lifestyle and yet enjoy a lifestyle most of us can only dream of. He offers several examples of eco-celebrities and their extreme consumption.

Jubbling posted an article in May 2010 about the hypocritical nature of Hollywood’s preaching and its reality – Hollywood Love$ Green Message$. How Does It Feel About Jubbling?. Being an eco-celebrity seems to be the 2000′s equivalent to the 1990′s recovering addicts; it gets you in the news. I have a feeling that Eco-Celebrity Rehab is just around the corner.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

$70-Large 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid Qualifies For Tax Break (And I Kick Myself In The Middle Again)

According to Green Car Reports, the 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid qualifies for a $1800 tax credit and I have to wonder – how does this happen? The US government offers the rebate to motivate consumers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles but in this case, something has to be wrong when a $70,000, 380hp, 20/24 mpg car qualifies for the credit. Automakers are obviously aware of how to get their cars hybrid-tax-credit-worthy and I’d hate to think that we are all paying for it. It seems unfair, especially when the my 1999 van also gets 20 mpg’s but goes 0-60 mph in 16.1 seconds and the Porsche Cayenne gets to 60 mph 10 seconds faster.

So congrats to the person buying the Porsche Cayenne S – you are going hybrid which is better – but for karma sake, maybe you could skip the line on your tax form where you get the $1800 credit. Or take the credit and donate it to a worthwhile cause… like Jubbling or me directly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Jubwinked? New Energy Technologies Inc.’s SolarWindow Uses Spray-On Solar Cells

New Energy Technologies SolarWindowOnce again, I hope New Energy Technologies is legit but I can’t help feeling Jubwinked again by a company with a technology that promises too much. New Energy Technologies just issued a press release about their spray-on-window solar cells that can outperform rooftop solar panels by 300%. When applied, the see-through SolarWindow technology will absorb sunlight entering the building as well as internal office lighting. According to New Energy Technologies, the SolarWindow “is made possible by spraying an electricity-generating coating on to glass at room temperature.” Conventional solar panel manufacturing requires high-heat in order to apply the the solar cells onto a opaque substrate and can not be transparent.

New Energy Technologies other product is MotionPower. MotionPower is basically a “speed bump” that generates electricity from the excess energy produced by moving cars and trucks passing over them. Here is a video that describes how the idea works:

YouTube Preview Image

In related news, Pat Mehiney is taking his wool socks public after demonstrating to 3 or 4 people his amazing ability to generate electricity*.

*The static variety

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

PepsiCo Dream Machine Recycling Kiosks

PepsiCo Dream MachineFrom the Wall Street Journal article PepsiCo Plans Recycling Initiative.

From one beverage to another – PepsiCo, partnering with Waste Management, is planning on installing 3000 recycling kiosks around the country to encourage consumers to recycle more cans and PET plastic bottles. PepsiCo is calling them “Dream Machines” and they are rewarding recyclers through a points system that can be applied toward movie tickets, travel or as discounts for Pepsi products. Currently in the US, only 34% of aluminum and 25% of the PET plastic bottles are being recycled and PepsiCo hopes to increase that number with their Dream Machines. The machines can hold 300 cans/plastic bottles and when they are full, an alert is sent to a Waste Management employee responsible for emptying the machine. Crushing does not occur at the machine because in product tests, consumers were put off by the noise. Here is how they work [WSJ]:

The machine itself is like a vending machine in reverse. A video screen plays advertising and informational videos, which are updated wirelessly and tailored to each site. A consumer first touches the screen and follows instructions, either to swipe a key fob to track rewards points or to defer registration for later, if at all.

PepsiCo Dream Machine Nightmare

A PepsiCo Dream Machine Nightmare

As much as Jubbling wants these great ideas to be the solution, they almost seem to be more of the problem. We felt the same way about ecoATM. It seems like companies are throwing grenades at a problem when they probably only need bb’s. PepsiCo’s Dream Machines are things of beauty and obviously a lot of thought was put into making them work but their limitations – only holding 300 cans or plastic bottles – and the cost of raw materials to build alone seems to outweigh their usefulness.

Alternatives? I keep imagining a person in a cardboard box paying you a compliment every time you recycle a can or PET bottle but that’s not going to be enough. I think the best method to increase recycling rates is for PepsiCo, Coke and the American Bottlers Association to support Bottle Bills in every state. Oregon was one of the first states to pass a Bottle bill and it passed in 1971 despite opposition from bottlers and beverage container manufacturers. It was expanded to cover water bottles in January 2009. With their Bottle bill in place, every beverage container leaving an Oregon grocery store or vending machine has a fee added to it that covers the refund and processing costs of recycled beverage containers. According to Wikipedia, recycle rates in states with Bottle bills is around 90% vs 34% in states without, and the collection sites are already in place – grocery stores.

I hope PepsiCo proves me wrong with their new Dream Machine kiosks. It’s just a feeling that companies like PepsiCo should look at the problem and find their next solution as if they had no resources; try to be truly grassroots. Maybe they’ll discover that the incentive to recycle occurs when you buy your soda and at the very least, maybe they’ll realize that another kiosk is not the solution and they’ll start supporting Bottle bills.

Useful links:
Bottle Bill Resource Guide
Container Recycling Institute
Keep America Beautiful

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon